What if everything you thought you knew about Meghan’s “miracle” babies was a carefully scripted illusion?
Candace Owens just unleashed a torrent of “evidence” that’s got royal insiders whispering and fans in full meltdown mode—dissecting hospital records, timeline glitches, and that viral “Baby Mama Dance” video that screams setup. Meghan? Reportedly frozen in disbelief as the accusations hit like a freight train. Is this the unraveling of a Hollywood heist… or just another chapter in the endless Sussex saga?
The truth bombs are dropping—will they explode the fairy tale for good? Click through for the full exposé that’s dividing the world. 👑🤰💥
Conservative firebrand Candace Owens has thrust herself back into the crosshairs of royal watchers with a blistering podcast episode that accuses Meghan Markle of fabricating her two high-profile pregnancies, calling the entire narrative a “scam” designed to bolster the Sussexes’ image and secure their escape from Buckingham Palace. The claims, aired on The Candace Owens Show last week, have exploded across social media, amassing millions of views and reigniting age-old conspiracy theories about Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet’s births—while drawing sharp rebukes from defenders who brand Owens’ rhetoric as reckless and racially charged.
Owens, 36, didn’t mince words during the September 23 episode, titled “The Royal Deception: Unmasking Meghan’s Maternity Myths.” Diving into what she described as “years of inconsistencies,” the commentator dissected Meghan’s 2019 pregnancy announcement with Archie—claiming the Duchess never gave birth at London’s Portland Hospital as initially reported, but instead “staged” the delivery via surrogate in the U.S. to maintain privacy amid intense media scrutiny. “The timelines don’t add up,” Owens asserted, pointing to discrepancies between Meghan’s Oprah Winfrey interview claims of a “helicopter ride” to the hospital and official palace statements. “She told us one story for the cameras, another for her Hollywood handlers. This wasn’t protection—it was production.”
The episode’s viral clip, viewed over 10 million times on YouTube alone, zeroes in on a resurfaced 2021 video of Meghan and Prince Harry performing the “Baby Mama Dance” in what appears to be a hospital room hours before Archie’s birth. Owens, a mother of four, dismissed it outright: “Hospitals don’t hand out beds for TikTok dances during labor induction. Take it from someone who’s been through it—this is staged, scripted, and straight-up fake.” She extended the allegations to Lilibet’s 2021 birth, suggesting both children were “acquired” through surrogacy arrangements hidden from the public to craft a narrative of resilience against the “toxic” British press.
Social media lit up like a powder keg. On X, #MeghanPregnancyScam trended globally within hours, with users sharing side-by-side comparisons of Meghan’s baby bump photos and hospital logs. “Candace just said what we’ve all suspected—those kids aren’t hers!” one post racked up 50,000 likes, while another quipped, “From Suits to surrogates: Meghan’s plot twist no one saw coming.” Critics, however, fired back fiercely. “This is the same tired racism dressed as ‘truth-seeking,'” tweeted a Sussex supporter, echoing broader accusations that Owens’ barbs tap into anti-Meghan tropes popularized since her 2018 wedding.
The controversy isn’t Owens’ first rodeo with the Duchess. Back in June 2025, she slammed a throwback clip of Meghan and Harry’s hospital jig as “bothersome” and “pretentious,” tying it to Meghan’s alleged continued use of her “Her Royal Highness” title on private gifts despite stepping back from royal duties in 2020. “She’s still playing princess while selling us sob stories,” Owens ranted then, a sentiment that has only amplified with her latest broadside. Her history with the Sussexes dates further: In 2021, Owens labeled Meghan a “leftist narcissist” unable to “keep her stories straight” post-Oprah, and in 2023, she mocked their New York “near-catastrophic car chase” as a Diana-esque publicity stunt.
Meghan’s pregnancies have long been fodder for speculation. Archie’s May 2019 arrival was shrouded in secrecy—no official hospital photos, just a black-and-white portrait released days later that sparked Photoshop rumors. The palace cited privacy concerns, but whispers of surrogacy surfaced almost immediately, fueled by Meghan’s IVF history hinted at in her 2021 interview. Lilibet’s June 2021 birth at Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital drew similar ire when birth certificate details emerged, prompting Harry to threaten legal action against outlets questioning the narrative. Both children were baptized privately, with godparents’ identities still under wraps, adding fuel to the fire.
Experts caution against the frenzy. Royal biographer Omid Scobie, a vocal Sussex ally, called Owens’ claims “dangerous fiction” in a Vanity Fair op-ed, arguing they perpetuate the “biracial bride as deceiver” stereotype that drove the couple’s 2020 Megxit. “This isn’t journalism—it’s vendetta,” Scobie wrote, referencing a 2024 Reddit analysis of media bias against Meghan. On the flip side, conservative pundit Angela Levin, author of Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War Between the Windsors, praised Owens for “daring to question the untouchable duo.” “The evidence is circumstantial, but the inconsistencies scream cover-up,” Levin told Fox News.
Psychologist Dr. Ramani Durvasula, an expert on narcissism, weighed in for New York Post: “Public figures like Meghan invite scrutiny, but accusations like these cross into harassment. They’re not just about facts—they’re about control and erasure.” Durvasula pointed to the racial undertones, noting how similar theories rarely target white royals like Kate Middleton, whose pregnancies faced far less invasive probing.
The Sussexes, holed up in their Montecito mansion, have stayed mum—a stark contrast to their past swift denials. A source close to the couple told People magazine, “They’re focused on their kids and ignoring the noise. This is just another hit piece from the hate machine.” Harry’s memoir Spare (2023) touched on the “trauma” of Archie’s birth amid family tensions, while Meghan’s Netflix series With Love, Meghan (premiered February 2025) featured tender family moments that now feel weaponized in the backlash. Her lifestyle brand As Ever, rebranded amid wildfire relief efforts, has pivoted to “authentic” storytelling, but Owens mocked a January clip of Meghan “stooping to help” victims as “performative philanthropy.”
Owens’ timing couldn’t be sharper. Her episode dropped amid Harry’s ongoing UK security lawsuit defeat and a frosty September reunion with King Charles III—no family photos, just strained pleasantries. The couple’s October New York award for mental health advocacy looms, but whispers of canceled appearances swirl. On X, pro-Sussex accounts rally with #ProtectTheKids, sharing paparazzi-free family pics from a recent Disneyland jaunt, while detractors flood timelines with “DNA test now” demands.
Legal eagles speculate on blowback. “If there’s defamation here, Meghan’s team could sue—but they’ve been burned before,” said entertainment attorney Debra Opri. Owens, undeterred, teased a follow-up with “whistleblower docs” on her show, daring critics: “Bring the receipts or stay silent.” Her past clashes, like a 2024 tabloid spat that sent her “into hiding,” haven’t slowed her roll.
As the dust settles—or doesn’t—the saga underscores the Sussexes’ tightrope walk: global icons to some, perpetual punchlines to others. Meghan’s July 2025 Confessions of a Female Founder podcast episode on “truth vs. lies” now reads like prophecy, with her musing, “The world loves a villain—especially when she’s winning.” Whether Owens’ exposé crumbles under scrutiny or cements Meghan’s “liar” label remains unseen. One thing’s certain: In the theater of public opinion, the curtain never fully drops.